top of page

Academic Standards

Academic standards provide a consistent basis for preparation, assessment, and review at the Grey School. Pupils are expected to engage with course instructions, respond thoughtfully to feedback, and seek assistance when a difficulty affects their work. Faculty have responsibility for explaining expectations and applying the standards of their courses.


Retakes and Grade Corrections


A passing assignment or examination may not be retaken simply to obtain a higher score. Retakes are available when the original work has failed. An error in grading is also grounds for review and, where needed to correct that error, an appropriate reassessment.


A pupil who believes an error has occurred should contact the instructor, identify the assignment, and explain the concern. Correction of an erroneous grade preserves the accuracy of the academic record.


Responding to a Failed Assignment


When work receives a failing grade, read the instructor's feedback carefully and contact the instructor to arrange the next step. The instructor may require further study or additional work before permitting a retake. A pupil may also be asked to expand or revise an assignment when the original submission does not address the required material adequately.


Preparation includes attention to the form of the submission. Writing should be clear enough for the instructor to assess, and formatting problems should be corrected before the work is resubmitted. Pupils remain responsible for following the instructions and addressing the reasons given for the failure.


Following an approved retake, the new grade replaces the previous failing grade.


Academic Probation


Academic Probation is a disciplinary option for circumstances in which difficulties with progress or conduct require coordinated academic oversight. Its purpose is to establish the conditions under which the pupil can address the problem and return to ordinary study.


The Master of Studies may place an Apprentice on Academic Probation. Faculty and other administrators may recommend probation to that office as part of an academic or disciplinary proposal. During the Master of Studies' absence, an appointed or authorized assistant to that office may approve Academic Probation, with the matter reviewed by the Master of Studies upon return.


A probation notice should identify the problem, state the terms that apply to the pupil, and give clear goals whose achievement will bring the probation to an end.


Grounds for Academic Probation may include:


  • Poor performance across several courses requiring a coordinated effort to improve academic skills and progress.

  • Chronically slow progress.

  • Intentional violation of rules governing the relationship between academic study and other School activities, including clubs, publications, and challenges.

  • Conduct that prevents instructors from working effectively with the pupil.

  • Failure or refusal to engage appropriately with study or assessment materials after guidance from Faculty.


The terms of probation may include appointing an Academic Advisor where one is not already assigned. Administration may require the pupil to leave one or more current courses temporarily so that attention can be given to the identified difficulty, or may require additional courses relevant to academic or personal conduct.


Other measures may include a temporary suspension of course activity or restrictions on course selection. Such restrictions may concern level, department, instructor, or subject. The pupil's notice should make the applicable conditions and the route to review clear.


Contacting Faculty


Begin by reviewing the syllabus, the relevant lesson, and the instructions associated with the assignment. Many questions can be resolved through a careful second reading. For general discussion that does not require an instructor's decision, Lodge or departmental discussion spaces may provide useful help from others studying the subject.


Questions affecting your work, assessment, or progress should be directed to the responsible instructor through the School's approved course communication route or institutional email. The Faculty page provides current Faculty information.


Correspondence should be professional and clear. Use an appropriate salutation and identify the course or assignment. Explain the question with enough detail for the instructor to respond, and conclude with your name and Lodge where relevant to locating your record. Chain messages and unrelated mass correspondence should not be sent to Faculty.


When a Response Is Delayed


Faculty are ordinarily allowed up to 72 hours to grade submitted work, respond to course-related requests, or process admission to a class. Announced absences, School holidays, and unusual circumstances may affect that period.


Once the expected time has passed, contact the instructor directly and allow a reasonable opportunity for a response. If the matter remains unresolved, bring it to the Master of Studies. Include the course, the dates of the submission or correspondence, and the information needed to understand the delay.


The wider routes for academic review are explained in Authority, Administration, and the Chain of Command.

bottom of page